Deception in Democracy: Political Lying Accusations and Their Effects on Democratic Citizenship
This project analyzes political lying accusations across 20 European countries to understand their historical trends, citizen perceptions, and impacts on trust and engagement in democracy.
Projectdetails
Introduction
In today’s age of ‘misinformation’, politicians are frequently accused of bending the truth to their advantage. As citizens rely on accurate and accessible information to meaningfully engage with politics, political lying violates the contract between citizens and their elected representatives. Political lying accusations therefore have the potential to erode citizens’ trust in and commitment to representative democracy as a system of governance.
Background
While political lying accusations may be as old as politics itself, we know little about when accusations of political lying take root, how accusations of political deception are perceived by citizens, and what their effects are on citizens’ democratic citizenship.
Project Objectives
To shed light on the issue of political lying accusations and its implications for democratic citizenship, this project:
- Describes the historical trends in political lying accusations.
- Identifies the conditions under which politicians accused one another of deception and characterizes the attributes of both the accused and accusers of political lying.
- Studies citizens’ perceptions of accusations of political deception by exploring the individual and contextual factors that influence these perceptions.
- Investigates the consequences for democratic citizenship by examining how exposure to lying accusations affects citizens’ trust in democracy, their support for liberal democracy as a system of governance, as well as their active engagement with politics.
Methodology
The empirical analyses focus on 20 European countries and rely on an integrated multi-method approach including:
- Automated text analysis
- Qualitative interviews
- Observational and experimental surveys
- Longitudinal survey evidence
Conclusion
By addressing these critical knowledge gaps, this project will provide invaluable insights into the dynamics of political deception and its consequences for democratic citizenship.
Financiële details & Tijdlijn
Financiële details
Subsidiebedrag | € 1.500.000 |
Totale projectbegroting | € 1.500.000 |
Tijdlijn
Startdatum | 1-8-2025 |
Einddatum | 31-7-2030 |
Subsidiejaar | 2025 |
Partners & Locaties
Projectpartners
- UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPENpenvoerder
- STICHTING RADBOUD UNIVERSITEIT
Land(en)
Vergelijkbare projecten binnen European Research Council
Project | Regeling | Bedrag | Jaar | Actie |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reconciling Citizens with the Tradeoffs of Democracy: Attitudes Toward Democracy Under Rising PoliticizationThis project investigates citizens' and parties' preferences on democratic tradeoffs in 15 European countries to understand their impact on support for democracy and develop new measurement tools. | ERC Starting... | € 1.499.967 | 2022 | Details |
Healthy or harmful distrust? On the democratic relevance of political scepticism over blind (dis)trustCRITICALTRUST develops a novel model to differentiate between blind and evaluative political (dis)trust, using cross-national surveys to enhance understanding and improve democratic engagement. | ERC Consolid... | € 1.999.995 | 2023 | Details |
New trends or old habits? Stability and changes of political styles since 1960The POLSTYLE project analyzes the evolution of political styles in four European democracies since 1960, examining how institutional factors shape these styles amid changing political contexts. | ERC Starting... | € 1.496.219 | 2023 | Details |
Affective Polarization and Democratic AttitudesDEPOLARIZE aims to identify interventions to reduce affective polarization and establish its causal link to democratic backsliding through experimental data from Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and the US. | ERC Starting... | € 1.499.740 | 2023 | Details |
Lobbying (A)symmetry: The Dynamics Behind Informed PolicyLOBBYMETRY analyzes lobbying imbalances in Europe to enhance policymaking transparency and improve representation of public interests in climate and digital policy. | ERC Starting... | € 1.499.043 | 2025 | Details |
Reconciling Citizens with the Tradeoffs of Democracy: Attitudes Toward Democracy Under Rising Politicization
This project investigates citizens' and parties' preferences on democratic tradeoffs in 15 European countries to understand their impact on support for democracy and develop new measurement tools.
Healthy or harmful distrust? On the democratic relevance of political scepticism over blind (dis)trust
CRITICALTRUST develops a novel model to differentiate between blind and evaluative political (dis)trust, using cross-national surveys to enhance understanding and improve democratic engagement.
New trends or old habits? Stability and changes of political styles since 1960
The POLSTYLE project analyzes the evolution of political styles in four European democracies since 1960, examining how institutional factors shape these styles amid changing political contexts.
Affective Polarization and Democratic Attitudes
DEPOLARIZE aims to identify interventions to reduce affective polarization and establish its causal link to democratic backsliding through experimental data from Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and the US.
Lobbying (A)symmetry: The Dynamics Behind Informed Policy
LOBBYMETRY analyzes lobbying imbalances in Europe to enhance policymaking transparency and improve representation of public interests in climate and digital policy.